The ontological argument is an argument for god’s existence based entirely on reason according to this argument, there is no need to go out looking for physical evidence of god’s existence we can work out that he exists just by thinking about it. Quizlet flashcards, activities and games help you improve your grades search create log in sign up log in sign up 2,000 terms he criticized anselm's assumption that existence is a predicate or base for an argument plantiga one of the traditional arguments for god's existence it relies on the idea that since god is the most.
Learn debate with free interactive flashcards choose from 500 different sets of debate flashcards on quizlet.
The fact that one can understand the argument without much in the way of philosophical skill is not necessarily a defect, however a good deal of the force of street’s argument stems from the assumption that naturalism is true, and therefore that the evolutionary process is one that is unguided “moral arguments for the existence of.
The most devastating attack on an argument is the denial of its assumption — without the assumption, the link between the premise and the conclusion is severed think broadly when identifying assumptions, one crucial point to remember: assumptions are most often general statements, not specific statements. Although unstated, the assumption is the nerve center of the argument, the linchpin holding the whole thing together strengthening and weakening arguments assumptions are crucial in understanding an argument, and because of this, they play a large role in two major critical reasoning question types.
There is controversy on all attempts to prove god using logic instead of straight observation the problem lies in that logic can only prove what conclusions follow axiomatically from different statements, but not how the statements are made itself without first observation so as in most.
The best argument for the existence of god will be a “big-picture” kind of argument god doesn’t believe in atheists the bible teaches that atheists are not really atheists.